Skip to content

fix: resolve NeMo Hydra target interpolation#1494

Open
mldangelo-oai wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
mdangelo/codex/fix-nemo-hydra-targets-c191
Open

fix: resolve NeMo Hydra target interpolation#1494
mldangelo-oai wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
mdangelo/codex/fix-nemo-hydra-targets-c191

Conversation

@mldangelo-oai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • resolve simple Hydra/OmegaConf target interpolations before dangerous/safe classification
  • fail closed on unresolved dynamic target selectors such as resolver expressions, missing references, cycles, or excessive depth
  • pin torch.utils.cpp_extension.load_inline as non-clean and preserve safe target negatives

Validation

  • focused C191/C194 slice: 10 passed, 200 deselected
  • PYTHONPATH=/private/tmp/modelaudit-c191 PROMPTFOO_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1 /Users/mdangelo/code/modelaudit/.venv/bin/pytest tests/scanners/test_nemo_scanner.py -q: 210 passed
  • ruff format --check modelaudit/scanners/nemo_scanner.py tests/scanners/test_nemo_scanner.py
  • ruff check modelaudit/scanners/nemo_scanner.py tests/scanners/test_nemo_scanner.py
  • mypy modelaudit/scanners/nemo_scanner.py tests/scanners/test_nemo_scanner.py
  • git diff --check

@mldangelo-oai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 31, 2026

Workflow run and artifacts

Performance Benchmarks

Compared 12 shared benchmarks with a regression threshold of 15%.
Status: 0 regressions, 0 improved, 12 stable, 0 new, 0 missing.
Aggregate shared-benchmark median: 773.09ms -> 759.70ms (-1.7%).

Workload Benchmark Target Size Files Baseline Current Change Status
chunked-upload-stream tests/benchmarks/test_picklescan_benchmarks.py::test_picklescan_chunked_upload_stream chunked_stream 278.2 KiB 1 22.33ms 23.40ms +4.8% stable
suspicious-pickle-intake tests/benchmarks/test_scan_benchmarks.py::test_scan_suspicious_pickle_intake suspicious-intake 183.8 KiB 4 104.54ms 100.29ms -4.1% stable
warm-cache-rescan tests/benchmarks/test_scan_benchmarks.py::test_scan_warm_cached_repository_rescan release-candidate 547.3 KiB 32 65.75ms 64.10ms -2.5% stable
duplicate-heavy-registry tests/benchmarks/test_scan_benchmarks.py::test_scan_duplicate_registry_snapshot registry-snapshot 915.2 KiB 13 222.17ms 216.80ms -2.4% stable
nested-payload-review tests/benchmarks/test_picklescan_benchmarks.py::test_picklescan_nested_payload_review[nested_base64] nested_base64 98 B 1 423.0us 413.6us -2.2% stable
single-checkpoint-preflight tests/benchmarks/test_scan_benchmarks.py::test_scan_single_checkpoint_before_load single_checkpoint.pkl 183.0 KiB 1 41.82ms 41.01ms -1.9% stable
clean-training-checkpoint tests/benchmarks/test_picklescan_benchmarks.py::test_picklescan_clean_training_checkpoint safe_large 278.2 KiB 1 19.35ms 19.65ms +1.5% stable
padded-multi-stream-upload tests/benchmarks/test_picklescan_benchmarks.py::test_picklescan_padded_multi_stream_upload multi_stream_padded 4.1 KiB 1 1.55ms 1.53ms -1.0% stable
direct-malicious-upload tests/benchmarks/test_picklescan_benchmarks.py::test_picklescan_direct_malicious_upload malicious_reduce 52 B 1 1.45ms 1.43ms -1.0% stable
mixed-model-repository tests/benchmarks/test_scan_benchmarks.py::test_scan_release_candidate_repository release-candidate 547.3 KiB 32 292.88ms 290.25ms -0.9% stable
nested-payload-review tests/benchmarks/test_picklescan_benchmarks.py::test_picklescan_nested_payload_review[nested_hex] nested_hex 130 B 1 419.1us 422.4us +0.8% stable
nested-payload-review tests/benchmarks/test_picklescan_benchmarks.py::test_picklescan_nested_payload_review[nested_raw] nested_raw 78 B 1 412.1us 412.1us +0.0% stable

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bf81544369

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread modelaudit/scanners/nemo_scanner.py Outdated
Comment thread modelaudit/scanners/nemo_scanner.py Outdated
Comment thread modelaudit/scanners/nemo_scanner.py
@mldangelo-oai mldangelo-oai marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2026 14:52
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ianw-oai ianw-oai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed; this looks acceptable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants